Improving analysis of writing

shutterstock_289584068

I don’t know about you, but I have found the AQA English Language, Paper 1, Question 3- commenting on the structure of a text- mighty troublesome this year! As much as I try to help students identify shifts in time, character, location, and find interesting patterns, they just can’t do it. Or if they do, they end up with the inevitable: ‘The writer uses …  to make the reader read on.’

We have tried highlighting, colouring in, drawing charts, learning key terms (exploded time, spatial shifts, juxtaposition) to no avail. However, in the last few weeks I have had a break through. Instead of starting with deconstructing other writers’ texts, we have focused on constructing our own texts.

When teaching descriptive writing, I put a big emphasis on HOW we construct our own writing, making students choose the methods they would use to put their texts together. I found the following key questions particularly helpful:

  • Which time frame do you want to use: over an hour, a day, a week, a year?
  • Who will you focus on? One character, a group of characters? Or will you switch between?
  • When do you want your description to take place? Spring, summer, autumn or winter?
  • At what time of day will it happen? Morning, afternoon, evening, night?
  • Where will it be set? Will you change locations?
  • How much detail do you want to go into? Are you going to zoom in for a close up, or sweep across a scene with a panning shot? (I find film analogies very useful!).
  • Which patterns do you want to use? Contrasting times, characters or locations? A cyclical beginning and end? A motif which will link together your sections?

The key to all of these questions is to get students to consider WHY they want to make these choices.

Once students have started to make these choices in their own writing, it becomes so much easier for them to unpack them in other people’s writing. It becomes less about feature spotting because students can now recognise the choices they made themselves in their own writing. 

So finally, this troublesome question is becoming a bit more straightforward and hopefully there we will have an end to those, ‘the reader wants to read on’ comments!


Naomi Hursthouse has been teaching in West Sussex for nine years. She has worked as an Advanced Skills Teacher for four years and is currently Head of English at Westergate Community School. She has worked as an examiner for AQA for nine years and has been writing articles and blogs about teaching for Collins Freedom to Teach since 2009. She was born in Dumbarton, Scotland but moved down to the South Coast of England for some sunshine ten years ago. She has finally found it.

Other Articles

Practical approaches to teaching KS3 Shakespeare

By Hannah Appleton Reframing or reimagining how we tackle Shakespeare in schools begins with our perception of it being boring, irrelevant or too difficult, especially if we teach in schools with high numbers of SEND, EAL or FSM. It is, however, precisely those complexities and layers Shakespearean texts provide, which… Read More

Academic writing for GCSE

Academic writing just means that our students need to write in a formal manner that reflects their level of educational and is distinct from how they would converse orally or via text.  A good approach is to gradually introduce students to a range of ways in which they can ensure their writing is more academic.  I find it helpful to divide these into three aims: being concise, being precise, and being sophisticated. Read More

Avoiding empty analysis in GCSE English

It’s important that we encourage students to explore structure and form when they are analysing a literary text.  However, this can sometimes lead to empty analysis.  I’ve regularly read comments on exam papers like, ‘The writer uses a comma to convey how the two people are separate’ or ‘By writing in rhyming couplets, the poet demonstrates the speaker’s love for her partner’.  Responses like these are often based on good ideas but, unfortunately, the analysis is tenuous: a comma doesn’t actually mean anything; a rhyming couplet doesn’t instantly represent love. Read More