Keep it authentic

Probably one of the most dispiriting things for a teacher to hear in class is the dreaded question “Sir/Miss, why have we got to learn about this?” The stock response is often “Because it’s in the specification…” closely followed by “…so you might get asked a question on it.” It kind of wins the argument, but kind of doesn’t. Not many pupils really don’t care about the grades they get but if good grades are all they get they could be excused for feeling a little hollow.

We need to have the skills and content specified for a publicly examined course and most pupils would probably accept that some material may have to be included just for the sake of completeness. We shouldn’t keep falling back on that, though. “Trust me, when you get to my age you’ll understand why this bit is important” is not recommended.

One of Ben Goldacre’s recent Bad Science columns was on Brain Gym and how pupils can use the skills of handling evidence to spot the errors in the way that ideas are presented. Many of these skills are part and parcel of a well taught KS4 course but sometimes pupils don’t see the point if the context is rather dry. However, they often love being put in the role of detectives (“Would you pay good money for this?”)

Brain Gym is one of the great (well, not great, but with huge potential for the teacher) ideas from Bad Science that has been turned into lesson plans for free download from the Collins website and included in the new generation of Collins text books and teacher packs. Soon you’ll be able to see video footage on the website showing how pupils responded when we tried the materials in a school. Not only did they make a cracking good job of spotting the flaws but got a real kick out of doing so.

We sometimes justify delaying the engaging applications to a later stage “you’ve just got to get through the basics now, then you’ll see how it can be applied.” This is a mistake. Science is at its most compelling when you care about what the results will prove – or disprove. For pupils to care about science they need to see it as a tool that they can use to make sense of things that matter.

The new GCSE courses are a pretext for improving schemes of learning. As well as covering the content, delivering the skills and preparing for assessment (all necessary but not sufficient) for pupils to really succeed they need to be engaged in study that is authentic.

The Bad Science materials show that finding engaging contexts is central to effective learning. The Collins team of authors have worked their socks off to find some really topical ways of putting things across. At the end of the day of course what we can do is to offer you some possibilities; it’s your role to think “now, what will really float the boat for that group?”

Ed Walsh, Science Advisor with Cornwall Learning.

Other Articles

Improving student writing for Extended Response Questions in AQA GCSE Sciences

The last twelve months or so have affected many people in many different ways.  Apart from the appalling death toll and the long-term effects on the health of many others, the control measures put in place have changed the way that schooling has worked for entire cohorts.  The Extended Response Question resource I edited for Collins turned out to be a lockdown publication in more ways than one.  Though conceived prior to the pandemic, much of the writing was done during the first lockdown.  Although designed for use in a conventional classroom setting, it has much relevance for the situation we now find ourselves in. This article outlines why good literacy is a key skill in science, and how you can help develop your students' extended writing to successfully tackle extended response questions in AQA GCSE Sciences. Why is literacy important in science? There is a long and not always easy relationship between science education and the development of literacy skills; extended response questions are probably at the sharp end of this.  Should the preparation of candidates to deal with ‘six markers’ be seen as a further burden on students and teachers and one peripheral to the central business of developing scientific knowledge and understanding? Is it seen as a key skill of a scientist to be able to construct a longer explanation? Is it best to simply be pragmatic and accept that it’s there in the exams and is worth a not insignificant number of marks? One of the hallmarks of the last year has been the high profile given to scientists, some of whom have become regular guests on news programmes and many of whom have acquitted themselves well not only in terms of the grasp of their specialism but also their ability to explain complex ideas.  This is not new of course; I would argue that it is part and parcel of being a scientist to be able to construct a longer response.  Being able to describe a procedure, compare two different approaches, or evaluate an idea is in the job description. Furthermore, many teachers have come to realise that getting students to write longer responses has a value that goes beyond simply demonstrating a competence in dealing with that type of question.  It shows whether they have understood ideas in more detail, can use key terminology in context and draw ideas together from different parts of the course. How can I improve my students’ extended responses? The AQA GCSE (9–1) Extended Response Questions Teacher Response Pack was written to offer teachers a way forward in three main ways:  The first was responding to the immediate situation if there are students in Year 11 who are underperforming and need both practice and guidance. We’ll soon know how these students will be assessed for the purposes of awarding grades this year and items like this may well figure large.  For some students, it’s more opportunities (so we’ve included dozens of such questions) and for others, it’s an unpacking of the command words.  Because AQA now use the same level descriptors each time a certain command word is used, students can be trained to respond accordingly.  An evaluate question needs a judgment, for example, and the candidate who doesn’t include one cannot get full marks. The second purpose is a more strategic view over the GCSE courses and a desire to integrate the use, both of the questions and ideas, about how to explicitly teach the skills of response over the duration of the course. The third is to support the view that it needs to be an even longer-term strategy.  We progressively develop practical skills and cornerstone concepts such as the particulate model of matter over five years; we should do the same with the skills of constructing longer responses. The constituent aspects of focusing on key terminology, quality sentence construction, and the organisation of text will serve students well on a number of fronts.  What some of our students need is repeated exposure to language and ideas.  We need to get them to not only think like a scientist but also to write like a scientist, and that won’t happen in the six weeks prior to an exam. How can I use this resource with my students? Twenty years in teaching and almost as many in curriculum development have taught me how inventive and creative teachers are (and have to be) in terms of devising approaches and developing ways of developing student competencies.  What we’ve done with this resource is to offer a toolkit.  There is a range of materials in there.  For each question, there is a model answer that would get full marks and another that would get some of the marks.  These are designed to present to students to develop their capacity to recognise improvements.  We’ve included commentaries as well, to support teachers to see what examiners will look for. The feedback we’re getting is that this lends itself to use in a range of ways, including learning at home.  In a recent interview in the Financial Times, Professor Sir John Holman (author of the Good Practical Science report) expressed the hope that the recently raised profile of science would increase interest in STEM careers, but that this would only happen if, principally amongst other factors, the teaching supported it.  Teaching needs to be good, and so do the tools that support it.  Check out the sample pages and see what you think. Watch Ed's talk at the ASE Conference 2021 to find out more about the AQA GCSE (9–1) Extended Response Questions Teacher Response Pack    By Ed Walsh Ed Walsh is a freelance consultant, specializing in science education. A teacher for twenty years and a team leader for twelve of those, he now writes and edits curriculum materials, designs and delivers CPD, and works with science departments to improve the quality of their provision. View secondary Science resources from Collins, including books written and edited by Ed. Read More

Ideas for re-engaging students with science this term

It’s always a risk when committing thoughts to paper (or cloud) on education policy and practice; what might seem adventurous or at least perceptive at the time of writing can look predictable or even downright out of date by the time it’s circulated.  Moving from hard print to digital communication… Read More

Hot topics from the ASE Science conference

The morning after the night before. This year’s ASE Conference was held in Birmingham in January. Always a good cure for New Year’s blues, it was a lively mix of ideas, projects and sharing of experiences.  A key topic of conversation for many people involved with the secondary phase was… Read More