What is changing?

Are you wondering what has really changed in the GCSE science specifications for first teaching in 2011?

Is the content of the GCSEs really the same?

-The Programme of Study hasn’t changed, so the content and HSW processes for GCSE Science (‘core’) are pretty much the same. 100% of this is specified by Ofqual. There has, however, been some reorganisation within the specifications.

-Additional Science has only around two thirds of the content specified by Ofqual, so Awarding Bodies have taken the opportunity to consult with teachers to clarify expectations and ‘tidy up’ areas of content.

-Separate Sciences have around half of the content specified by Ofqual so there is more that is distinctive about these; Awarding Bodies have taken this opportunity to change some content.

-Additional Applied Science has 100% of the content specified. 60% of the marks are awarded from controlled assessments.

There is no choice of contexts studied; coverage of a balanced range of concepts is required.

And what about assessment?

-All courses, apart from Additional Applied, have controlled assessment worth 25% of the marks. The remaining 75% of marks are equally split between two or three external assessment units. For some of you this represents a marked reduction in the number of assessment units.

-There is a phased introduction of the assessment units; not all of them will be available from the outset. Science is first available for accreditation in 2012 followed by other courses in 2013.

-Students can take one re-sit of each assessment unit (including the controlled assessment). The higher mark counts, though this is over-ridden by the ‘40% rule’ (see below).

-The ‘40% rule’ stipulates that at least 40% of the marks for a course have to be allocated at the end of the course, when the marks are ‘cashed in’ and the grade awarded.

-There is more emphasis on maths and practical work. Students with more opportunities to engage with practical activities will be better equipped for controlled assessments.

-The suite of Controlled Assessments will change every twelve months, though they may be published earlier.

-All assessment units have to include a balanced range of types of questions. These may include objective questions, single word answers, sentence completion and extended written responses.

-Three Assessment Objectives (AOs) will be tested. AO1 requires that students recall, select and communicate their knowledge and understanding of science; AO2 that students apply skills, knowledge and understanding of science in practical and other context; AO3 that students analyse and evaluate evidence, make reasoned judgments and draw conclusions based on evidence.

-Candidates will be assessed on the Quality of Written Communication. Candidates must ensure that text is legible and that spelling, punctuation and grammar are accurate so that meaning is clear, select and use a form and style of writing appropriate to purpose and to complex subject matter and organise information clearly and coherently, using specialist vocabulary when appropriate. QWC will be assessed via responses to longer response questions.

-How Science Works is clearly stipulated and is embedded in the specifications. Generally speaking the abilities will be assessed via the controlled assessments and the knowledge and understanding part, such as ‘how and why decisions about science and technology are made’ will be assessed in the external assessments.

Ed Walsh, Science Adviser with Cornwall Learning.

Other Articles

Improving student writing for Extended Response Questions in AQA GCSE Sciences

The last twelve months or so have affected many people in many different ways.  Apart from the appalling death toll and the long-term effects on the health of many others, the control measures put in place have changed the way that schooling has worked for entire cohorts.  The Extended Response Question resource I edited for Collins turned out to be a lockdown publication in more ways than one.  Though conceived prior to the pandemic, much of the writing was done during the first lockdown.  Although designed for use in a conventional classroom setting, it has much relevance for the situation we now find ourselves in. This article outlines why good literacy is a key skill in science, and how you can help develop your students' extended writing to successfully tackle extended response questions in AQA GCSE Sciences. Why is literacy important in science? There is a long and not always easy relationship between science education and the development of literacy skills; extended response questions are probably at the sharp end of this.  Should the preparation of candidates to deal with ‘six markers’ be seen as a further burden on students and teachers and one peripheral to the central business of developing scientific knowledge and understanding? Is it seen as a key skill of a scientist to be able to construct a longer explanation? Is it best to simply be pragmatic and accept that it’s there in the exams and is worth a not insignificant number of marks? One of the hallmarks of the last year has been the high profile given to scientists, some of whom have become regular guests on news programmes and many of whom have acquitted themselves well not only in terms of the grasp of their specialism but also their ability to explain complex ideas.  This is not new of course; I would argue that it is part and parcel of being a scientist to be able to construct a longer response.  Being able to describe a procedure, compare two different approaches, or evaluate an idea is in the job description. Furthermore, many teachers have come to realise that getting students to write longer responses has a value that goes beyond simply demonstrating a competence in dealing with that type of question.  It shows whether they have understood ideas in more detail, can use key terminology in context and draw ideas together from different parts of the course. How can I improve my students’ extended responses? The AQA GCSE (9–1) Extended Response Questions Teacher Response Pack was written to offer teachers a way forward in three main ways:  The first was responding to the immediate situation if there are students in Year 11 who are underperforming and need both practice and guidance. We’ll soon know how these students will be assessed for the purposes of awarding grades this year and items like this may well figure large.  For some students, it’s more opportunities (so we’ve included dozens of such questions) and for others, it’s an unpacking of the command words.  Because AQA now use the same level descriptors each time a certain command word is used, students can be trained to respond accordingly.  An evaluate question needs a judgment, for example, and the candidate who doesn’t include one cannot get full marks. The second purpose is a more strategic view over the GCSE courses and a desire to integrate the use, both of the questions and ideas, about how to explicitly teach the skills of response over the duration of the course. The third is to support the view that it needs to be an even longer-term strategy.  We progressively develop practical skills and cornerstone concepts such as the particulate model of matter over five years; we should do the same with the skills of constructing longer responses. The constituent aspects of focusing on key terminology, quality sentence construction, and the organisation of text will serve students well on a number of fronts.  What some of our students need is repeated exposure to language and ideas.  We need to get them to not only think like a scientist but also to write like a scientist, and that won’t happen in the six weeks prior to an exam. How can I use this resource with my students? Twenty years in teaching and almost as many in curriculum development have taught me how inventive and creative teachers are (and have to be) in terms of devising approaches and developing ways of developing student competencies.  What we’ve done with this resource is to offer a toolkit.  There is a range of materials in there.  For each question, there is a model answer that would get full marks and another that would get some of the marks.  These are designed to present to students to develop their capacity to recognise improvements.  We’ve included commentaries as well, to support teachers to see what examiners will look for. The feedback we’re getting is that this lends itself to use in a range of ways, including learning at home.  In a recent interview in the Financial Times, Professor Sir John Holman (author of the Good Practical Science report) expressed the hope that the recently raised profile of science would increase interest in STEM careers, but that this would only happen if, principally amongst other factors, the teaching supported it.  Teaching needs to be good, and so do the tools that support it.  Check out the sample pages and see what you think. Watch Ed's talk at the ASE Conference 2021 to find out more about the AQA GCSE (9–1) Extended Response Questions Teacher Response Pack    By Ed Walsh Ed Walsh is a freelance consultant, specializing in science education. A teacher for twenty years and a team leader for twelve of those, he now writes and edits curriculum materials, designs and delivers CPD, and works with science departments to improve the quality of their provision. View secondary Science resources from Collins, including books written and edited by Ed. Read More

Ideas for re-engaging students with science this term

It’s always a risk when committing thoughts to paper (or cloud) on education policy and practice; what might seem adventurous or at least perceptive at the time of writing can look predictable or even downright out of date by the time it’s circulated.  Moving from hard print to digital communication… Read More

Hot topics from the ASE Science conference

The morning after the night before. This year’s ASE Conference was held in Birmingham in January. Always a good cure for New Year’s blues, it was a lively mix of ideas, projects and sharing of experiences.  A key topic of conversation for many people involved with the secondary phase was… Read More